CONSTRUCTION ERP
The problem
On most projects progress is reported as a percentage that nobody can reconstruct. The site says 70%, the consultant certifies 62%, and finance recognises 58% — three numbers with three methods behind them.
When progress is computed from measured quantity against the BOQ, the three converge, and the disagreement becomes a measurement question rather than a negotiation.
Core workflow
From quantity to certified progress.
01
Contract quantity
The BOQ line as awarded, with revisions tracked.
02
Executed quantity
Booked from the daily report on site.
03
Physical progress
Weighted by BOQ value, per activity and section.
04
Financial progress
Value earned against the contract sum.
05
Certified quantity
Consultant-agreed measurement, with the delta visible.
06
Variance
Plan vs. actual, S-curve and schedule impact.
What it covers
Measurement
Quantity per BOQ lineProgress weighting by valueActivity and section roll-upRemeasurement and revisionsProvisional and lump-sum handling
Views
Physical vs. financial progressPlanned vs. actual S-curveProgress by discipline and areaEarned value indicatorsRemaining quantity and value
Certification
Executed vs. certified deltaMeasurement sheets and backupJoint measurement recordsDisputed quantity registerCertification history
Connects with
Operational outcomes
1
Progress method, agreed in writing
−6.4 pts
Gap between reported and certified
Weekly
Progress update cadence
100%
Progress traceable to a quantity
Ranges observed on Al Jawad engagements. Targets agreed in assessment.